All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Gazing Into an Abyss: Defining the Non-protected Abstract Matters in EU Copyright Law

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00139520" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00139520 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2024/24-April-2024/gazing-into-an-abyss_67185c72aa.html" target="_blank" >https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2024/24-April-2024/gazing-into-an-abyss_67185c72aa.html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.38023/8bbed4fc-76b7-45e4-86ef-798d3524d66a" target="_blank" >10.38023/8bbed4fc-76b7-45e4-86ef-798d3524d66a</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Gazing Into an Abyss: Defining the Non-protected Abstract Matters in EU Copyright Law

  • Original language description

    Thanks to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the requirement of “sufficient precision and objectivity” became a further cornerstone of the, as of now harmonized, notion of work (“Werkbegriff”). This requirement shall provide for legal certainty of third parties as regards to the extent of protected subject matter. The borderline is formed, inter alia, by the direct opposite, i.e., abstract matters. The main aim of this contribution is to concretely define the abstract (sic!) in copyright law. To achieve this aim the contribution firstly shortly explains the requirement of “sufficient precision and objectivity” as introduced by CJEU. In this step the “definitions of non-protected subject matter” are to be observed and synthetised and thus a picture of “the void” in copyright protection should be formed. As the “abstractness” is mostly encountered in the area of computer programs, this subject matter should be regarded the primary focus of the study. Moreover, the patent law deals in extensive matter what is not to be protected on the basis of being abstract, i.e., being a “non-invention”. To find out these boundaries, EPO conclusions in the area of computer-implemented inventions are utilised. In the end, the contribution shall find common regulatory features in these two areas of intellectual property law and discuss what conclusions could be theoretically applicable to the delimitation of the authorial work and to contribute to the ongoing debate on the scope of the protected subject matter in the EU copyright law.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA22-22517S" target="_blank" >GA22-22517S: Copyrighted Works and the Requirement of Sufficient Precision and Objectivity</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Jusletter IT

  • ISSN

    1664-848X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    Neuveden

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    April

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    451-457

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85196424807