Human Rights as Utilitarian Project
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00139522" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00139522 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/0913110410.31577filozofia.2024.79.7.3.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/0913110410.31577filozofia.2024.79.7.3.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.7.3" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.7.3</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
Lidská práva jako utilitaristický projekt
Original language description
Human rights, as a special kind of moral rights, have traditionally been seen as guides for legally institutionalized human rights practice. However, there are several problems with this conception. It seems that not every moral right makes sense to translate into a legal form, and at the same time not all legal rights have a moral antecedent. Thus, human rights ethics requires some supplementation in order to justify institutionalized rights. At the same time, it is not usually seen as final, but we expect it to be supported by further justification, for example by its relation to normative agency, basic needs or capabilities. This raises the question of whether it is redundant, whether its role could be superseded by elements that further justify it. The article defends the thesis that as such it can be superseded by utilitarian reasons. Using them, we can reach the same conclusions, but with several significant advantages over competing approaches. Utilitarianism is not only an analytically clear theory that minimizes the normative basis of our reasoning, but it can offer a justification for that practice without having to be supplemented by some other approach. At the same time, it can easily deal with the redundancy objection.
Czech name
Lidská práva jako utilitaristický projekt
Czech description
Human rights, as a special kind of moral rights, have traditionally been seen as guides for legally institutionalized human rights practice. However, there are several problems with this conception. It seems that not every moral right makes sense to translate into a legal form, and at the same time not all legal rights have a moral antecedent. Thus, human rights ethics requires some supplementation in order to justify institutionalized rights. At the same time, it is not usually seen as final, but we expect it to be supported by further justification, for example by its relation to normative agency, basic needs or capabilities. This raises the question of whether it is redundant, whether its role could be superseded by elements that further justify it. The article defends the thesis that as such it can be superseded by utilitarian reasons. Using them, we can reach the same conclusions, but with several significant advantages over competing approaches. Utilitarianism is not only an analytically clear theory that minimizes the normative basis of our reasoning, but it can offer a justification for that practice without having to be supplemented by some other approach. At the same time, it can easily deal with the redundancy objection.
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA23-06790S" target="_blank" >GA23-06790S: Human Rights and Welfarism</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Filozofia
ISSN
0046-385X
e-ISSN
2585-7061
Volume of the periodical
79
Issue of the periodical within the volume
7
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
737-751
UT code for WoS article
001318847300003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85206184307