All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Interpreting the SEA directive: a focus on plans, programmes, and reasonable alternatives

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00141432" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00141432 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-025-00843-x" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-025-00843-x</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-025-00843-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s12027-025-00843-x</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Interpreting the SEA directive: a focus on plans, programmes, and reasonable alternatives

  • Original language description

    This article delves into the interpretative challenges surrounding the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive (2001/42/EC), with a particular focus on the definition of “plans and programmes” and the assessment of “reasonable alternatives.” It examines the 2024 Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Case C-727/22 (Friends of the Irish Environment), which determined that Ireland’s “Project Ireland 2040” does not fall under the SEA Directive, thereby precluding a substantive response on reasonable alternatives. The paper explores the complexities in defining “plans and programmes” crucial for the Directive’s effective application and environmental protection. Additionally, it addresses the ongoing lack of clarity in the interpretative framework for assessing reasonable alternatives under the SEA Directive. The article draws upon CJEU jurisprudence and analyses recent judgments from the Czech Supreme Administrative Court to shed light on these issues.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    ERA Forum

  • ISSN

    1612-3093

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    26

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    337-355

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105008246538