Hoist the Colours High: Reassessing the Digital Services Act in a Liberal Democratic Europe
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00141995" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00141995 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Hoist the Colours High: Reassessing the Digital Services Act in a Liberal Democratic Europe
Original language description
This paper explores how legal responsibility for content moderation is being reshaped by the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), focusing on the principle of proportionality and its role in legitimising platform governance. Drawing on a comparative study based on questionnaire responses from legal rapporteurs across several EU member states, the paper examines how procedural safeguards such as notice and takedown systems, and the requirement in Article 17 for clear statements of reasons, are applied in practice. Although the DSA presents itself as a protective framework intended to harmonise digital regulation in the interest of transparency and accountability, its implementation reveals uneven oversight, selective enforcement, and growing opacity. Platforms frequently become the de facto arbiters of legality, often issuing generic justifications without meaningful avenues for contestation. What appears to be a legal safeguard may function instead as a symbolic gesture that conceals discretion and reproduces asymmetries of power. From a critical legal studies perspective, the paper argues that the DSA reinforces a technocratic model of regulation in which procedural compliance is prioritised over democratic accountability. Proportionality, rather than acting as a substantive check, becomes part of a legal performance that lends legitimacy to private control. Reassessing digital regulation through this lens means asking who is empowered to speak, who is subject to moderation, and whether the law can still serve as a tool of resistance within increasingly enclosed digital environments.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50501 - Law
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů