All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Judicial empowerment of chief justices in Central Europe through supranational means: Judicial self-defense or judicial self-dealing?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F25%3A00143333" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/25:00143333 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/23/1/279/8151483" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/23/1/279/8151483</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaf017" target="_blank" >10.1093/icon/moaf017</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Judicial empowerment of chief justices in Central Europe through supranational means: Judicial self-defense or judicial self-dealing?

  • Original language description

    Chief justices in Central Europe-defined as the presidents of the supreme court-are powerful and consequential actors. Politicians in the region are well aware of this fact and have sought to undermine, bypass, or replace them. This article shows that chief justices have, in many cases, fought back. It argues that the increased supranational protection of judicial independence in Europe has changed the dynamics between chief justices and their domestic governments and, more broadly, has increased the likelihood of judicial resistance by chief justices in the face of democratic decay. Chief justices can, under such conditions, leverage supranational institutions and transnational alliances to halt or slow down backsliding. At the same time, this article cautions against uncritical supranational support for chief justices, as they may also misuse or abuse supranational protection for personal or political gain. The article concludes with suggestions for how the strategies adopted by chief justices in Central Europe can be adapted in jurisdictions outside Europe, where supranational safeguards for judicial independence are less robust.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50501 - Law

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    ICON-International Journal of Constitutional Law

  • ISSN

    1474-2640

  • e-ISSN

    1474-2659

  • Volume of the periodical

    23

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    279-297

  • UT code for WoS article

    001497604600001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105012256324