All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Are we measuring concern about global climate change correctly? Testing a novel measurement approach with the data from 28 countries

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F16%3A00087643" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/16:00087643 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-016-1812-0" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-016-1812-0</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1812-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10584-016-1812-0</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Are we measuring concern about global climate change correctly? Testing a novel measurement approach with the data from 28 countries

  • Original language description

    The aim of this study is to test the Campbell paradigm (Kaiser et al. 2010) as a novel theoretical framework for the measurement of concern about global climate change and to compare this measurement approach with conventional assessment of GCC concern which is based exclusively on evaluative rating of global climate change concern. Using survey data from 28 European countries (N = 27,919), we find that GCC concern can be inferred not just from evaluative statements related to GCC, as is done in conventional measures, but also from other types of attitude-relevant responses (such as self-reports of mitigation activities and evaluation of mitigation policies). In addition, we also find that even though Campbellian measure is related in a theoretically expected way to conventional evaluative scale of GCC concern, and both measures assess the same latent construct, the former measure can predict difficult mitigation activity whereas the evaluative scale fails in this test of criterion validity.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AN - Psychology

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/TD03000282" target="_blank" >TD03000282: Impact Evaluation Measures for Campaigns Focusing on Reducing Individual Greenhouse Gas Emissions</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Climatic Change

  • ISSN

    0165-0009

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    139

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    397-411

  • UT code for WoS article

    000388962300005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database