ON THE RECEPTION OF ADORN'S METHOD IN RECENT FORMS OF CRITICAL THEORY

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F16%3A00094287" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/16:00094287 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

čeština

Original language name

K RECEPCI ADORNOVY METODY V AKTUÁLNÍCH PODOBÁCH KRITICKÉ TEORIE

Original language description

The essay deals with the reception of Adorno's method in critical theory's contemporary forms. Firstly, it explores the Marxist methodological root of Adorno's theorizing in the concept of exchange (Adorno has slightly modified Marx's argumentation in Capital by focusing on the exchange process rather than on the value-form). Secondly, the essay criticizes Habermas' and Honneth's interpretations of Adorno's approach: both of them are unable to explicate Adorno's dialectical materialism. That is why in Habermas and Honneth the critical theory collapses into a form of transcendental thought. Thirdly, against Habermas and Honneth, the essay argues that SohnRethel's critical Marxist proposal to reconstruct critical theory as a dialectical exposition (Darstellung) of capitalism the historically determinate society premised upon the totality of,real abstractions' provides much better initiation to Adorno's method.

Czech name

K RECEPCI ADORNOVY METODY V AKTUÁLNÍCH PODOBÁCH KRITICKÉ TEORIE

Czech description

The essay deals with the reception of Adorno's method in critical theory's contemporary forms. Firstly, it explores the Marxist methodological root of Adorno's theorizing in the concept of exchange (Adorno has slightly modified Marx's argumentation in Capital by focusing on the exchange process rather than on the value-form). Secondly, the essay criticizes Habermas' and Honneth's interpretations of Adorno's approach: both of them are unable to explicate Adorno's dialectical materialism. That is why in Habermas and Honneth the critical theory collapses into a form of transcendental thought. Thirdly, against Habermas and Honneth, the essay argues that SohnRethel's critical Marxist proposal to reconstruct critical theory as a dialectical exposition (Darstellung) of capitalism the historically determinate society premised upon the totality of,real abstractions' provides much better initiation to Adorno's method.

Type

J_x - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

CEP classification

AO - Sociology, demography

OECD FORD branch

—

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2016

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Filozofia

ISSN

0046-385X

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

71

Issue of the periodical within the volume

3

Country of publishing house

SK - SLOVAKIA

Number of pages

13

Pages from-to

173-185

UT code for WoS article

000373413500001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

—