All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Stopping the Evil or Settling for the Lesser Evil : An Experimental Study of Costly Voting with Negative Payoffs in a TRS Electoral System

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F17%3A00094554" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/17:00094554 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_9" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_9</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_9" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_9</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Stopping the Evil or Settling for the Lesser Evil : An Experimental Study of Costly Voting with Negative Payoffs in a TRS Electoral System

  • Original language description

    The strategic voting across families of various electoral systems is often depicted as “settling for lesser evil” (e.g. Cox, 1997, Gschwend, 2004) in order to prevent the worst outcome of elections. In this paper we experimentally (13 sessions with 18-30 participants, 546 voting situations) explore the degree of strategic voting (as compared to non-voting) framed in situations with (non-compulsory) costly voting where voters face outcomes with positive and negative payoffs (“stopping the evil” framing) and/or with solely negative payoffs (“settling for lesser evil” framing). We explore voters’ decisions in rather complex environment of the two-round electoral system, with symmetric amount of private information about the preferences of electorate available to them and show that voters’ behavior does differ markedly in both the situations. The results have implications for the representation and democracy.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA13-20548S" target="_blank" >GA13-20548S: Experimental research of electoral behavior and decision-making in highly personalised elections</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Recent Trends in Social Systems : Quantitative Theories and Quantitative Models

  • ISBN

    9783319405834

  • Number of pages of the result

    15

  • Pages from-to

    89-103

  • Number of pages of the book

    426

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Heidelberg

  • UT code for WoS chapter