Reflecting on a Common Core and the Variability of Social Work Definitions : “Theme and its Interpretations” by Foucault
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F20%3A00115105" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/20:00115105 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10437797.2019.1656573" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10437797.2019.1656573</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1656573" target="_blank" >10.1080/10437797.2019.1656573</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Reflecting on a Common Core and the Variability of Social Work Definitions : “Theme and its Interpretations” by Foucault
Original language description
The assumed impossibility of forming a widely accepted view of social work is explained on the one hand by the contesting nature of social work definitions and on the other by a loss of professional identity since the 1960s. The aim of the article is to elaborate a third explanation based on the hypothesis that social workers adhere to their differing interpretations of common social work themes. The argument for this article is designed from Foucault’s idea of a “thematic realm which reveals a set of possible interpretations.” To reach the aim, we address the question of why Bartlett, who explicitly adheres to an individual view of a common social work theme, emphasizes her specific interpretation of what she identifies as the social work focus. By generalizing the answer to this question, a hypothesis on the motives for defining social work in terms of individual views of a common social work theme is developed. It is argued that the lack of a widely accepted view of social work is a consequence of social work being defined by individual social workers based on ideas beyond their immediate conscious control. Suggestions are made on how to educate social workers to reflect on their unexamined motives for adhering to dissimilar interpretations of social work common themes.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50602 - Public administration
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Social Work Education
ISSN
1043-7797
e-ISSN
2163-5811
Volume of the periodical
56
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
384-393
UT code for WoS article
000484911100001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85071966516