All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Does Politicization Matter? Small States in East-Central Europe and the Brexit Negotiations

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00118721" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00118721 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0888325419888686?journalCode=eepa" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0888325419888686?journalCode=eepa</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325419888686" target="_blank" >10.1177/0888325419888686</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Does Politicization Matter? Small States in East-Central Europe and the Brexit Negotiations

  • Original language description

    The integration process is increasingly politicized across the member states of the European Union (EU). While this phenomenon has been analyzed from many perspectives, this article aims to look at a so far neglected aspect—how increased levels of politicization of the EU might have impacted on the role small states play in the EU decision-making process. Using the case of Brexit negotiations, the article starts from the hypothesis that higher levels of politicization could increase the influencing capacity of smaller states. As national sovereignty concerns may become more relevant due to politicization, it can be expected that small states become more active in EU-level negotiations, especially in cases where the future of the integration is also at stake. However, looking at the cases of Czechia, Hungary, Slovakia, and Slovenia, the article concludes that the behavior of these countries is still determined by their small-state character. Interestingly, different levels of EU politicization did not determine their bargaining strategies in Brexit negotiations. Consequently, while we see a slight variation in the level of engagement, the article argues that the influencing capacity of the member states under scrutiny was mainly driven by their small state characteristics.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-05612S" target="_blank" >GA18-05612S: United in Differences: Visegrad Contribution To EU Differentiated Integration</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures

  • ISSN

    0888-3254

  • e-ISSN

    1533-8371

  • Volume of the periodical

    35

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    136-155

  • UT code for WoS article

    000509642400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85078501227