All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Villain or victim? Framing strategies and legitimation practices in the Russian perspective on the European Union’s Third Energy Package

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00121203" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00121203 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621000554?dgcid=author" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621000554?dgcid=author</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101962" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.erss.2021.101962</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Villain or victim? Framing strategies and legitimation practices in the Russian perspective on the European Union’s Third Energy Package

  • Original language description

    This article investigates the Russian reaction to the Third Energy Package (TEP) of the European Union (EU). This legislation aimed at integrating the EU’s internal gas market but also became a game-changer for EU–Russia energy relations. The framing strategies through which the Russian regime has made sense of TEP are explored and the entanglement of these strategies with the Kremlin’s claim to great power status – one of the key pillars of its legitimation strategy – are scrutinized. Altogether, three frames are identified. They differ from each other in their depictions of the EU and of the legislation itself. The EU is perceived as a misguided partner, deceptive counterpart, or geopolitical rival, while TEP is viewed as an ill-informed policy, a unilateral decision which disregards Russia’s legitimate interests, or a direct attack on Gazprom and, consequently, on Russia. At least one frame also bears a strong legitimation message as it connects with Russia’s mythology and collective memory. It resonates with Russia’s deeply-rooted desire to be recognized as a great power and posits TEP as an act of rejection through which Russia is denied this status.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Energy Research & Social Science

  • ISSN

    2214-6296

  • e-ISSN

    2214-6326

  • Volume of the periodical

    74

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    April

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    1-14

  • UT code for WoS article

    000635382200008

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85102129388