All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F21%3A00122825" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/21:00122825 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/624" target="_blank" >https://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/624</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.624" target="_blank" >10.14712/18023061.624</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection

  • Original language description

    The main goal of our study is to compare attitudes to climate protection and wildlife protection, as the gap in this field of research – not only in the Czech Republic – persists. In this study we provide a detailed analysis and comparison of the public support for climate protection and wildlife protection using nationally representative data from the Czech Repub-lic. The results of regression analyses have shown that support for both protections is signi-ficantly increasing with growing pro-environmental beliefs of people, leisure time they spent in nature and their altruism. Support for climate protection also rises with higher election participation, left-wing political orientation and younger age. Support for wildlife protection increases with growing trust in non-profit organizations while decreases with growing trust in science &amp; research institutions. The comparison of groups defined according to their con-sent with climate protection and wildlife protection showed that support for wildlife protection can be characterized as a more inclusive environmental attitude than support for climate protection. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for protagonists of environ-mental politics and ways how they approach the public.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Envigogika : Charles University E-journal for Environmental Education

  • ISSN

    1802-3061

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    16

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    33

  • Pages from-to

    1-33

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database