Agency Troubles : a Review of Isaac Reed’s Power in Modernity : Agency Relations and the Creative Destruction of the King’s Two Bodies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00124910" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00124910 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10767-021-09395-7" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10767-021-09395-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10767-021-09395-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10767-021-09395-7</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Agency Troubles : a Review of Isaac Reed’s Power in Modernity : Agency Relations and the Creative Destruction of the King’s Two Bodies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020)
Original language description
Power in Modernity can be read in many ways, as application and extension of Reed’s methodological book on interpretation, as elaboration and demonstration of a novel theory of power, and finally, as reflection on modernity through the lenses of shifting imaginations of power. Reed’s new book consists of three parts: the first, theoretical, section develops a theory of agency relations and power; the second, empirical, section uses the theoretical apparatus to illuminate several case studies of power in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, mainly in North America but also in England and France; and the third, concluding, section engages in a metatheoretical discussion of (power in) modernity. There is much to discuss about Power in Modernity, depending on one’s interests. In the following, I will first discuss Power in Modernity as a Weberian theory of power as delegation, which is embedded in a culturally sensitive framework. Afterwards, I will address the Hegelian social theory underlying the argument of the book and raise the question: With what should we replace Hegel’s concept of the spirit? Finally, I will offer a reading of Power in Modernity as a historical sociology of the present, discussing populism, conspiracy theories, and political scandals as contemporary phenomena to which Reed’s theory could be applied.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50401 - Sociology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society
ISSN
0891-4486
e-ISSN
1573-3416
Volume of the periodical
35
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
265-278
UT code for WoS article
000617498100001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85101031001