All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Visegrad Four and EU Differentiated Integration : Activities, Perception and Self-Perception after the Refugee Crisis

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00129062" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00129062 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429054136-35/" target="_blank" >https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429054136-35/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429054136-35" target="_blank" >10.4324/9780429054136-35</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Visegrad Four and EU Differentiated Integration : Activities, Perception and Self-Perception after the Refugee Crisis

  • Original language description

    There has been a growing discussion on the unity and internal integrity of the EU in recent years. The Visegrad Four group (V4) has played a somewhat ambiguous role in this debate. Looking at the literature and current political events, there seem to be two competing views. Whereas the first view is rather skepticalsceptical about the V4’s ability to have a coherent impact on European integration, the second perceives the V4 as one of the main sources of the current EU’´s problems. This chapter contributes to this discussion by adding a systematic analysis of the V4’s ability to promote a different Europe. It looks not only at the activities of the V4 (and its members), but it also considers the perception of the V4 by its EU partners. Using findings from three case studies – the migration crisis, Brexit and the debate on the future of the EU – it concludes that as activities at the group level are concerned, the V4 as a compact group is a myth. Moving to the perception dimension, the V4 seems to be a more influential “brand” in this regard than it is an active player. But more often than as a compact, four-member group, it appears to be recognized as 2+2 grouping where the first “2” stands for the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the second for Poland and Hungary.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50601 - Political science

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-05612S" target="_blank" >GA18-05612S: United in Differences: Visegrad Contribution To EU Differentiated Integration</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union

  • ISBN

    9780367149659

  • Number of pages of the result

    18

  • Pages from-to

    519-536

  • Number of pages of the book

    749

  • Publisher name

    Routledge

  • Place of publication

    London

  • UT code for WoS chapter