Does union type make a difference when you separate? Frequency of father–child contact and father’s satisfaction with the relation
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F22%3A00129127" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/22:00129127 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://genus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41118-022-00169-3" target="_blank" >https://genus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41118-022-00169-3</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41118-022-00169-3" target="_blank" >10.1186/s41118-022-00169-3</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Does union type make a difference when you separate? Frequency of father–child contact and father’s satisfaction with the relation
Original language description
Growing separation and divorce rates have attracted scholars’ attention to the association between relationship breakup and the relations between fathers and their minor children. Pre-separation life course events and characteristics may influence this relationship. One important characteristic to be considered is the type of union in which ex-partners were in. In this article, we study the association between previous union type and post-dissolution father–child face-to-face contact and father’s satisfaction with the relationship, before and after controlling for factors related to selection into a cohabiting union. Using pooled data from the first wave of the Generations and Gender Survey for 11 European countries, it is shown that, models that do not control for characteristics typically connected with selection into different union types suggest that previously cohabiting fathers have less intensive contact with their child(ren) and are less satisfied with the relationship with their minor children. Taking into consideration the main socio-demographic father and child’s characteristics, this difference turns out not to be statistically significant. This research suggests that union type does not make a difference, confirming most previous studies of single European countries.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50402 - Demography
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA17-18235S" target="_blank" >GA17-18235S: Institutionalization of unmarried cohabitations: obligations, inter-generational exchange, and couple disagreements in a comparative perspective</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Genus : Journal of Population Sciences
ISSN
0016-6987
e-ISSN
2035-5556
Volume of the periodical
78
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
23
Pages from-to
1-23
UT code for WoS article
000825404600001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85134232224