Debating irregular migration in the European Parliament : a ‘parliament without a public’ or the voice of the people?

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F23%3A00129974" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/23:00129974 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108" target="_blank" >10.1080/14782804.2022.2086108</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Debating irregular migration in the European Parliament : a ‘parliament without a public’ or the voice of the people?

Original language description

The European Parliament (EP) has been characterised as a ‘working parliament without a public’ rather than as a ‘debating parliament’. However, this distinction was called into question when irregular migration became a sensitive topic and national political parties became polarised on this policy. Thus, this article explores whether one risk resulting from such a characterisation – a lack of public involvement – is raised by EU members in plenary debates on irregular migration issues. In particular, the analysis focuses on the purpose of EU plenaries and investigates the audience for speech acts in EP debates on irregular migration issues. The qualitative, manual content analysis of three debates shows that MEPs address their speeches to multiple audiences, including other MEPs, political groups and members of the Commission and Council, excluding national parties and voters. Speech acts aimed at EU officials, together with problem-solving argumentation, support the characterisation of the EP as a ‘working parliament without a public’. It contributes to maintaining the EU communication gap. In contrast, speakers legitimate their speeches by claiming to represent the common people, to be the vox populi. The article concludes by challenging the role of plenary debates in an age of rising Euroscepticism and populism.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50601 - Political science

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2023

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Journal of Contemporary European Studies

ISSN

1478-2804

e-ISSN

1478-2790

Volume of the periodical

31

Issue of the periodical within the volume

3

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

15

Pages from-to

874-888

UT code for WoS article

000807605200001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85131602530