Religious Argument as an Argument from Authority
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F23%3A00136219" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/23:00136219 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.iurium.cz/media/File/2405/File486.pdf?attachment-filename=Ratio-Publica-II-2023.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.iurium.cz/media/File/2405/File486.pdf?attachment-filename=Ratio-Publica-II-2023.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Religious Argument as an Argument from Authority
Original language description
Assessment of the legitimacy of religious conviction in political deliberation requires a closer inspection of the different forms in which religious arguments appear. This article argues that even if the fundamental premises of liberal critics of religious arguments are correct, the only type of religious argument that can be considered as inherently incompatible with public justification has to contain explicitly religious content and has to be formulated as an argument from authority. This conclusion can be confirmed, on different grounds, by a rival, natural law tradition. The natural law tradition stipulates that the law is an ordinance of reason and should therefore be justified in a way that would allow reasonable citizens to affirm its reasonableness and obey it because of that. Argument from religious authority can therefore be judged impermissible even when religion is not treated with indifference, but as a constitutive aspect of human flourishing. On the other hand, by formulating the problem in terms of authority this debate raises the question of the status of non-political authority in political deliberation. The fundamental importance of non-political communities and the structures of authority they create to coordinate themselves invites a deeper inquiry into whether non-political authorities should play a more essential role in political deliberation and justification.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50601 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA23-06790S" target="_blank" >GA23-06790S: Human Rights and Welfarism</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Ratio Publica
ISSN
2787-9550
e-ISSN
2787-9569
Volume of the periodical
3
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
20
Pages from-to
6-25
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85194102153