Beyond military : Defining and addressing the transnational security threats in the contemporary Arctic
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14230%2F25%3A00143670" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14230/25:00143670 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/CPR/article/view/42690" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/CPR/article/view/42690</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CPR2025-S-1" target="_blank" >10.5817/CPR2025-S-1</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Beyond military : Defining and addressing the transnational security threats in the contemporary Arctic
Original language description
The Arctic states face a broadspectrum of specific regional securityissues centredaround two complementary aspects, defending humans from extremes of nature (climate) and protecting the natural environment against damage caused by human activities (pollu-tion). The first group of challenges encompasses extreme weather patterns, melting sea ice and permafrost, and rising sea levels. The second group includes various pollutants, including persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, plastics, a significant military and nuclear presence, industrial development, and shipping. In addition, hybrid threats, ille-gal activities, and the interests of non-Arctic states represent a new and emerging cate-gory of security challenges for the region. Most of these challenges are multiplying threats that do not respect borders or sectoral boundaries and require coordinated trans-national action. Given the limited capacity of individual states to address security threats promptly and the trans-national nature of certain issues, regional cooperation is a pre-requisite for achieving success. History shows us that during the Cold War, the most politically frozen time of all, the Arctic states, including the United States and the Soviet Union, were able to overcome their animosity and cooperate on environmental chal-lenges. One of the outcomes of this cooperation was the establishment of the Arctic Council in 1996. Is it realistic to expect a similar development today?The Russian invasion of Ukraine has largely ended cooperation between Moscow and other Arctic countries. Can shared security challenges enhance cooperation in the region and beyond? How important are environmental issues for the states? Can Arctic science diplomacy be a useful approach to the improvement of relations? These are some of the research ques-tions that this chapter addresses. The author also investigates mechanisms for coopera-tion in times of conflict and the role of international scientific cooperation in the Arctic. The chapter concludes with an exploration of possible future scenarios in the region.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50600 - Political science
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Czech Polar Reports
ISSN
1805-0689
e-ISSN
1805-0697
Volume of the periodical
15
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Special Issue
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
25
Pages from-to
1-25
UT code for WoS article
001656303100001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—