All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of mercury distribution between liver and muscle: a biomonitoring of fish from lightly and heavily contaminated localities

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F08%3A00026245" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/08:00026245 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60076658:12610/08:00008891 RIV/62157124:16270/08:00001757

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of mercury distribution between liver and muscle: a biomonitoring of fish from lightly and heavily contaminated localities

  • Original language description

    Tissue samples were collected between 1991 and 1996 at 13 locations along the River Elbe, from 1,117 fish of 25 species. The principal indicator species were perch (Perca fluviatilis) (n=118), roach (Rutilus rutilus) (n=138) and chub (Leuciscus cephalus)(n=113). Mercury (Hg) concentrations in muscle and liver were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. In fish from lightly contaminated sites, Hg concentration in muscle was higher than that in liver, whereas at heavily contaminated sites, liver Hg concentration was higher than in muscle. The liver/muscle ratios in three indicator species from heavily contaminated and lightly contaminated localities were significantly different. In fish from heavily contaminated localities, Hg was deposited preferentially in the liver (the depository for inorganic and organic forms of Hg), while in lightly contaminated areas, it was deposited preferentially in muscle. The predominant type of Hg occurring in muscle is the organic form methylmercur

  • Czech name

    Comparison of mercury distribution between liver and muscle: a biomonitoring of fish from lightly and heavily contaminated localities

  • Czech description

    Tissue samples were collected between 1991 and 1996 at 13 locations along the River Elbe, from 1,117 fish of 25 species. The principal indicator species were perch (Perca fluviatilis) (n=118), roach (Rutilus rutilus) (n=138) and chub (Leuciscus cephalus)(n=113). Mercury (Hg) concentrations in muscle and liver were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. In fish from lightly contaminated sites, Hg concentration in muscle was higher than that in liver, whereas at heavily contaminated sites, liver Hg concentration was higher than in muscle. The liver/muscle ratios in three indicator species from heavily contaminated and lightly contaminated localities were significantly different. In fish from heavily contaminated localities, Hg was deposited preferentially in the liver (the depository for inorganic and organic forms of Hg), while in lightly contaminated areas, it was deposited preferentially in muscle. The predominant type of Hg occurring in muscle is the organic form methylmercur

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    DJ - Pollution and water control

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Others

  • Publication year

    2008

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Sensors

  • ISSN

    1424-8220

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    8

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000258180500004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database