All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Too good to be true: Pitfalls of using mean Ellenberg indicator values in vegetation analyses

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F12%3A00057357" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/12:00057357 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01366.x/abstract" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01366.x/abstract</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01366.x" target="_blank" >10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01366.x</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Too good to be true: Pitfalls of using mean Ellenberg indicator values in vegetation analyses

  • Original language description

    Question: Mean Ellenberg indicator values (EIVs) may inherit information about compositional similarity, as during their calculation species abundances (or presence-absences) are used as weights. Can this similarity issue actually be demonstrated, does it bias results of vegetation analyses correlating mean EIVs with other aspects of species composition and how often are biased studies published? Methods: In order to separate information on compositional similarity possibly present in mean EIVs, a new variable was introduced, calculated as a weighted average of randomised species EIVs. The performance of these mean randomized EIVs was compared with that of the mean real EIVs on the one hand and random values (randomized mean EIVs) on the other. To demonstrate the similarity issue, differences between samples were correlated with similarity matrices based on various indices.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    EF - Botany

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GAP505%2F11%2F0732" target="_blank" >GAP505/11/0732: Generalized supervised classification in community ecology</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Others

  • Publication year

    2012

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Vegetation Science

  • ISSN

    1100-9233

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    23

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    419-431

  • UT code for WoS article

    000303042300003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database