Comparison of Standard- and Proprietary-Based Approaches to Detailed 3D City Mapping

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F15%3A00082181" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/15:00082181 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_11" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_11</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_11" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_11</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of Standard- and Proprietary-Based Approaches to Detailed 3D City Mapping
Original language description
3D information is essential for a number of applications used daily in various domains such as facility management, including energy management, urban planning, telecommunications, and safety and security, etc. This paper is devoted to 3D modelling at the level of city districts with the campus and buildings modelling use case. Different methods and technologies commonly used in this area are first analysed and discussed. Emphasis is placed on the comparison of the standardized approach, represented bythe CityGML (City Geography Markup Language), and proprietary technologies (developed by Masaryk University as a part of facility management called the Building Documentation System). This comparison is demonstrated on a sample 3D model of the Faculty ofScience at Masaryk University in Brno, the Czech Republic, situated on Kotlářská Street. Both types of 3D models were developed while focusing on their benefits and limitations.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)