Comparison of Two Polynomial Calibration Methods
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F17%3A00098867" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/17:00098867 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://mitav.unob.cz/data/MITAV%202017%20Proceedings.pdf" target="_blank" >http://mitav.unob.cz/data/MITAV%202017%20Proceedings.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of Two Polynomial Calibration Methods
Original language description
In the contribution we focused on comparison of two polynomial calibration methods. We compare a method based on maximum likelihood method, and a method using linearised model with errors in variables and Kenward Roger's type of aproximation. First, we introduce models for boths procedures. Then we estimate unknown parameters of transformation function with use of these models. We compare both methods in a small simulation study.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10103 - Statistics and probability
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Mathematics, Information Technologies and Applied Science 2017
ISBN
9788075820266
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
193-207
Publisher name
University of Defence
Place of publication
Brno
Event location
Brno
Event date
Jan 1, 2017
Type of event by nationality
CST - Celostátní akce
UT code for WoS article
—