The strength in numbers: comprehensive characterization of house dust using complementary mass spectrometric techniques
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F19%3A00113353" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/19:00113353 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00216-019-01615-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00216-019-01615-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01615-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00216-019-01615-6</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The strength in numbers: comprehensive characterization of house dust using complementary mass spectrometric techniques
Original language description
Untargeted analysis of a composite house dust sample has been performed as part of a collaborative effort to evaluate the progress in the field of suspect and nontarget screening and build an extensive database of organic indoor environment contaminants. Twenty-one participants reported results that were curated by the organizers of the collaborative trial. In total, nearly 2350 compounds were identified (18%) or tentatively identified (25% at confidence level 2 and 58% at confidence level 3), making the collaborative trial a success. However, a relatively small share (37%) of all compounds were reported by more than one participant, which shows that there is plenty of room for improvement in the field of suspect and nontarget screening. An even a smaller share (5%) of the total number of compounds were detected using both liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Thus, the two MS techniques are highly complementary. Most of the compounds were detected using LC with electrospray ionization (ESI) MS and comprehensive 2D GC (GCxGC) with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and electron ionization (EI), respectively. Collectively, the three techniques accounted for more than 75% of the reported compounds. Glycols, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and various biogenic compounds dominated among the compounds reported by LC-MS participants, while hydrocarbons, hydrocarbon derivatives, and chlorinated paraffins and chlorinated biphenyls were primarily reported by GC-MS participants. Plastics additives, flavor and fragrances, and personal care products were reported by both LC-MS and GC-MS participants. It was concluded that the use of multiple analytical techniques was required for a comprehensive characterization of house dust contaminants. Further, several recommendations are given for improved suspect and nontarget screening of house dust and other indoor environment samples, including the use of open-source data processing tools. One of the tools allowed provisional identification of almost 500 compounds that had not been reported by participants.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10608 - Biochemistry and molecular biology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Analytical and Bioanalytical chemistry
ISSN
1618-2642
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
411
Issue of the periodical within the volume
10
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
21
Pages from-to
1957-1977
UT code for WoS article
000464714400004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85062728989