Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F21%3A00119168" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/21:00119168 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/NR/D0NR08693B" target="_blank" >https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/NR/D0NR08693B</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0nr08693b" target="_blank" >10.1039/d0nr08693b</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Is centrifugal ultrafiltration a robust method for determining encapsulation efficiency of pesticide nanoformulations?
Original language description
Loading active ingredients on nanocarrier systems is becoming a common strategy for improving pesticide formulations. One of the most important properties of these nanoformulations is the proportion of pesticide associated with the nanocarriers (encapsulation efficiency, EE). EE is often determined by centrifugal ultrafiltration. However, the losses of active ingredient in the centrifugal ultrafiltration devices are typically not assessed, potentially leading to erroneous results. In this work, the losses of three pesticides (tebuconazole, terbuthylazine and chlorpyrifos) during centrifugal ultrafiltration have been systematically evaluated for nine different devices. Results suggest that centrifugal ultrafiltration is not suitable for determining the EE of compounds such as chlorpyrifos as 100% losses were observed on all the devices tested. Losses of tebuconazole and terbuthylazine were highly variable according to the type of membrane and the lowest losses were observed in the devices with hydrophilic regenerated cellulose membranes. Based on these results, we propose a correction factor and demonstrate its application to calculate the EE of two nanoformulations based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanocarriers. The approach extends the applicability of centrifugal ultrafiltration to a wider range of pesticide nanoformulations. We also discuss the effect of dilution on EE and make recommendations to improve the characterisation of nanoparticles-based pesticide nanoformulations in the future.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10400 - Chemical sciences
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Nanoscale
ISSN
2040-3364
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
10
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
5410-5418
UT code for WoS article
000630384400023
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85102860594