All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F21%3A00120714" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/21:00120714 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/abs/first/radiopro200037/radiopro200037.html" target="_blank" >https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/abs/first/radiopro200037/radiopro200037.html</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020066" target="_blank" >10.1051/radiopro/2020066</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring

  • Original language description

    During the traditional way of radiation field monitoring - walking measurements – is possible to encounter inaccessible or dangerous areas. For this case, the National Institute for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Protection (SUJCHBO) has created the method of aerial measurement of ambient dose equivalent rate (ADER) using the drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer. This paper presents two methods on estimation of near-surface gamma radiation based on aerial measurements with Drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer D230A. The D230A was first tested in a room fitted with walls with a higher amount of natural radionuclides from uranium series. The aerial measurements were done at SUJCHBO’s Heliport at three altitudes (6, 11 and 16 m) and from the obtained data, the values of ADER for the altitude of 1 m were calculated and compared with the data measured in the altitude of 1 m. From the two proposed methods, the first one serves for evaluation of the whole measured area while the second method serves for evaluation of zones of interest. In the case of the first method, the highest difference between the calculated and measured data for the altitude of 1 m was 20% and, in case of the second method, the difference of -13.3% and -8.2% was achieved.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Radioprotection

  • ISSN

    0033-8451

  • e-ISSN

    1769-700X

  • Volume of the periodical

    56

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    FR - FRANCE

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    61-67

  • UT code for WoS article

    000626691500009

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85102432121