Golden mimics use multiple defenses to counter generalist and specialist predators
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F23%3A00134285" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/23:00134285 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad076" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad076</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad076" target="_blank" >10.1093/beheco/arad076</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Golden mimics use multiple defenses to counter generalist and specialist predators
Original language description
Many prey species employ multiple defenses during interactions with predators. Multiple defenses can provide a selective advantage against a single predator at different stages of the interaction or attack, as well as against multiple predator types. However, the efficacy of multiple defenses both during different sequences of an attack and against multiple predator types, remains poorly understood. We measured and classified defensive traits used by five mimics (Mullerian and Batesian) of the myrmecomorphic golden mimicry complex and one non-mimetic species. We then performed predatory trials using two different predators that differed markedly in their body size, trophic specialization, and how they handle prey-one being an ant specialist (spider) and the other a generalist which avoided ants (skink). We identified 12 defensive traits and classified them into four groups (primary, chemical, mechanical, and behavioral), which were strongly correlated. Skinks were much less likely to attack and capture mimics than the ant-eating spider predators. Our results show that multiple defenses (five or six) were used against each predator. The defensive behaviors and features that were most effective against skinks included appendage waving and large body size, whereas the golden "shine" warning signal, large body size, cuticle thickness, and defensive gland size were most effective against spiders. Most defenses appeared to be predator-specific. We conclude that potential prey in the golden mimicry complex have been selected for multiple defenses because of their vulnerability to different predator types and consequently, the efficacy of some of these defenses likely represents a trade-off.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10614 - Behavioral sciences biology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA19-09323S" target="_blank" >GA19-09323S: Mimetic complexes and the evolution of inaccurate mimics</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Behavioral Ecology
ISSN
1045-2249
e-ISSN
1465-7279
Volume of the periodical
34
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
1055-1064
UT code for WoS article
001070370200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85177769584