All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Intentional Automobility: Mobility Choice Between Socialist and Postsocialist Chrononormativity

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F24%3A00139328" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/24:00139328 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2249083" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2249083</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2249083" target="_blank" >10.1080/24694452.2023.2249083</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Intentional Automobility: Mobility Choice Between Socialist and Postsocialist Chrononormativity

  • Original language description

    This article responds to the uncritical use of chronological time and the strict division between past, present, and future when thinking about mobility behavior or mobility decisions. On the basis of this critique, it introduces the concept of intentional automobility, which relies on the Bergsonian–Deleuzian conception of time—duration (la durée). It shows that transport-mode decisions are not only made in the present, separated from the past and the future, but that the past and the future are part of every such decision. Using the example of the metropolitan area of Brno, Czech Republic, a postsocialist space, we show how differently socialist and postsocialist societies can be temporally normalized. At the same time, contemporary postsocialist mobility decisions are still influenced by socialist time norms—chrononormatives. Our main research question is how everyday mobility decisions between the car and public transport are influenced by the temporal norms of the society. To answer this question, we have employed a mixed methods research design that has been divided into a quantitative analysis of mode choice for individual trips and a qualitative analysis of statements about mode choice. Key findings include the relationship between transport-mode preference and a particular chrononormative. We identify four contexts—time, routing, alcohol, and everyday activity planning—in which the chrononormatives associated with the car and public transport are substitutable. It is on this basis that we introduce intentional automobility.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50701 - Cultural and economic geography

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA17-16097S" target="_blank" >GA17-16097S: Spatial injustice of automobility technologies</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Annals of the American Association of Geographers

  • ISSN

    2469-4452

  • e-ISSN

    2469-4460

  • Volume of the periodical

    114

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    21

  • Pages from-to

    255-275

  • UT code for WoS article

    001080344900001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85174008736