All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Do parasite communities differ between invasive and native fish hosts? A case of monogeneans infecting the gills of Nile tilapia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14310%2F25%3A00143412" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14310/25:00143412 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10750-024-05789-8</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Do parasite communities differ between invasive and native fish hosts? A case of monogeneans infecting the gills of Nile tilapia

  • Original language description

    A release from parasites is assumed to be a major factor to the success of invasive species. However, strong evidence for a lower parasite load in invasive species is sparse on a larger geographical scale. To test this hypothesis, we analysed the monogenean gill parasite communities of invasive and native Nile tilapia across the African continent. We find significantly lower parasite loads in invasive populations, but no difference in parasite richness between invasive and native populations. Additionally, significant differences in parasite load and richness within the native range were found. We analysed the parasite community composition with a permanova and found strong variation in parasite communities both among native and invasive Nile tilapia. About 16% of this variation could be explained by two significant explanatory variables: introduction status of the host (4%) and ichthyofaunal province (12%), meaning both introduction status and geographical location influence parasite community composition. Furthermore, significant indicator parasite species were found for introduction status, river basin and ichthyofaunal province. Overall, we illustrate the potential value of ectoparasites to inform about the native environment and introduction history of fish. Possibly, this type of forensic parasitology, easily performed on museum specimens, could be useful to help resolve enigmatic invasions.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    HYDROBIOLOGIA

  • ISSN

    0018-8158

  • e-ISSN

    1573-5117

  • Volume of the periodical

    852

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    15

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    3911-3928

  • UT code for WoS article

    001395753300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85217412132