All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F19%3A00109059" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/19:00109059 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8802110" target="_blank" >https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8802110</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00019" target="_blank" >10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00019</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Mistakes in UML Diagrams: Analysis of Student Projects in a Software Engineering Course

  • Original language description

    The Unified Modelling Language (UML) is being widely accepted as a standard modelling notation for visualizing software systems during design and development. UML has thus become part of many software engineering course curricula at universities worldwide, providing a recognized tool for practical training of students in understanding and visualizing software design. It is however common that students have difficulties in absorbing UML in its complexity, and often repeat the same mistakes that have been observed by course tutors in previous years. Having a catalogue of such mistakes could hence increase the effectiveness of both teaching and learning of UML diagrams. In this paper, we present such a catalogue, consisting of 146 types of mistakes in eight types of diagrams. As the main contribution of this study, we use this catalogue to guide the analysis of student projects within a software engineering course. In total, over 2,700 diagrams submitted over 12 weeks of a semester by 123 students were analysed to identify the frequency of mistakes (from the catalogue), correlations of the mistakes between different diagram types, correlation of the quality of student projects to exam results, student behaviour in terms of introducing and fixing the mistakes over time, and other interesting insights. The analysis is described together with its setup and execution, and all datasets and detailed guidebook to the catalogue of all mistakes is made available for download.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10200 - Computer and information sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training

  • ISBN

    9781728110004

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    100-109

  • Publisher name

    IEEE Press

  • Place of publication

    Piscataway, NJ, USA

  • Event location

    Montreal

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2019

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000570746000011