Biased RSA private keys: Origin attribution of GCD-factorable keys
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F20%3A00115914" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/20:00115914 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-59013-0_25" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-59013-0_25</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59013-0_25" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-59013-0_25</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Biased RSA private keys: Origin attribution of GCD-factorable keys
Original language description
In 2016, Švenda et al. (USENIX 2016, The Million-key Question) reported that the implementation choices in cryptographic libraries allow for qualified guessing about the origin of public RSA keys. We extend the technique to two new scenarios when not only public but also private keys are available for the origin attribution -- analysis of a source of GCD-factorable keys in IPv4-wide TLS scans and forensic investigation of an unknown source. We learn several representatives of the bias from the private keys to train a model on more than 150 million keys collected from 70 cryptographic libraries, hardware security modules and cryptographic smartcards. Our model not only doubles the number of distinguishable groups of libraries (compared to public keys from Švenda et al.) but also improves more than twice in accuracy w.r.t. random guessing when a single key is classified. For a forensic scenario where at least 10 keys from the same source are available, the correct origin library is correctly identified with average accuracy of 89% compared to 4% accuracy of a random guess. The technique was also used to identify libraries producing GCD-factorable TLS keys, showing that only three groups are the probable suspects.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Computer Security – ESORICS 2020
ISBN
9783030590123
ISSN
0302-9743
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
20
Pages from-to
505-524
Publisher name
Springer
Place of publication
Cham, Switzerland
Event location
Cham, Switzerland
Event date
Jan 1, 2020
Type of event by nationality
CST - Celostátní akce
UT code for WoS article
—