All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Counting Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F21%3A00122309" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/21:00122309 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81688-9_15" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81688-9_15</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81688-9_15" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-81688-9_15</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Counting Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets

  • Original language description

    Given an unsatisfiable Boolean formula F in CNF, an unsatisfiable subset of clauses U of F is called Minimal Unsatisfiable Subset (MUS) if every proper subset of U is satisfiable. Since MUSes serve as explanations for the unsatisfiability of F, MUSes find applications in a wide variety of domains. The availability of efficient SAT solvers has aided the development of scalable techniques for finding and enumerating MUSes in the past two decades. Building on the recent developments in the design of scalable model counting techniques for SAT, Bendik and Meel initiated the study of MUS counting techniques. They succeeded in designing the first approximate MUS counter, AMUSIC, that does not rely on exhaustive MUS enumeration. AMUSIC, however, suffers from two shortcomings: the lack of exact estimates and limited scalability due to its reliance on 3-QBF solvers. In this work, we address the two shortcomings of AMUSIC by designing the first exact MUS counter, CountMUST, that does not rely on exhaustive enumeration. CountMUST circumvents the need for 3-QBF solvers by reducing the problem of MUS counting to projected model counting. While projected model counting is #NP-hard, the past few years have witnessed the development of scalable projected model counters. An extensive empirical evaluation demonstrates that CountMUST successfully returns MUS count for 1500 instances while AMUSIC and enumeration-based techniques could only handle up to 833 instances.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Computer Aided Verification - 33rd International Conference

  • ISBN

    9783030816872

  • ISSN

    0302-9743

  • e-ISSN

    1611-3349

  • Number of pages

    24

  • Pages from-to

    313-336

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • Event location

    Cham

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2021

  • Type of event by nationality

    CST - Celostátní akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000693429500015