Reporting verbs as indicators of stance in academic discourse
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F08%3A00034470" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/08:00034470 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Reporting verbs as indicators of stance in academic discourse
Original language description
Academic discourse is now generally seen as a purposeful interaction between writers and readers in which the writers try to construct a coherent and credible representation of themselves and their research and to negotiate their relationship with the discourse community by referring to the work of others and by evaluating their views. Previous studies on citation practices in academic writing have concentrated on showing differences in the preferences of academic communities by discipline. This contribution tries to examine the differences in the citation practices in academic English on the basis of an analysis of unpublished undergraduate and graduate theses, while discussing the differences in the choice of reporting verbs as means for expressing evaluation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AI - Linguistics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2008
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Porta Lingea-2008. Szakember, szaktudás, szakuyelv.
ISSN
1785-2420
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
2008
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
HU - HUNGARY
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—