Cross-Examination Questioning: Lay People as Cross-Examiners
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F10%3A00043496" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/10:00043496 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Cross-Examination Questioning: Lay People as Cross-Examiners
Original language description
The study deals with a quantitative analysis of cross-examination questions and a qualitative analysis of cross-examination strategies. The cross-examination questioning of a highly experienced counsel is contrasted with the cross-examination style of two pro se litigants who represent themselves in court. The data are drawn from a libel case McDonalds Corporation v. Helen Steel and David Morris. The author comes to the conclusion that the pro se litigants develop in inter-genre during the court proceedings and learn from the counsel to use more coercive questions. But their development remains unstable.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
C - Chapter in a specialist book
CEP classification
AI - Linguistics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2010
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Book/collection name
The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics
ISBN
978-0-415-46309-6
Number of pages of the result
14
Pages from-to
—
Number of pages of the book
673
Publisher name
Routledge
Place of publication
Milton Park, Abingdon
UT code for WoS chapter
—