Allometric normalization of handgrip strength in older adults: Which body size parameter is the most appropriate?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14510%2F23%3A00132339" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14510/23:00132339 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://bmcsportsscimedrehabil.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13102-023-00628-0" target="_blank" >https://bmcsportsscimedrehabil.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13102-023-00628-0</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-023-00628-0" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13102-023-00628-0</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Allometric normalization of handgrip strength in older adults: Which body size parameter is the most appropriate?
Original language description
BackgroundAlthough absolute handgrip strength has been associated with health-related outcomes in older adults, little evidence has been provided regarding its adjustment by a variety of body size dimensions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to establish the most appropriate normalization of handgrip strength by different body size parameters in a large sample of noninstitutionalized older adults.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 643 men and women aged > 60, who were part of the rehabilitation center facility program. Handgrip strength was objectively measured using a Jamar Plus* + Digital Hand Dynamometer. Body size parameters included body weight and height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, fat mass and fat-free mass. The most appropriate parameter associated with handgrip strength was identified using allometry.ResultsFindings showed that the most appropriate body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization was height (allometric exponent: 0.85), compared to fat-free mass (0.26) and body mass (0.12). Other body size variables were not significantly associated with handgrip strength and were omitted from further analyses. The correlations between normalized handgrip strength were significant when handgrip strength was normalized by body mass and fat-free mass, while no significant correlations were found, when handgrip strength was normalized by body height.ConclusionBased on the study results, body height seems to be the best body size parameter for handgrip strength normalization in older adults, omitting the influence of body size on strength performance. If handgrip strength is measured, body height may help normalize strength for large-scale research.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30304 - Public and environmental health
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN
2052-1847
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
15
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
1-7
UT code for WoS article
000928762700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85147885974