All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Financial Performance Feedback and R&D: A Comparison of Different Models

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F18%3A00102571" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/18:00102571 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/view/1034/973" target="_blank" >http://www.qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/view/1034/973</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V22I1.1034" target="_blank" >10.12776/QIP.V22I1.1034</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Financial Performance Feedback and R&D: A Comparison of Different Models

  • Original language description

    Purpose: Performance feedback either supports or undermines a firm’s current strategy. R&amp;D is one of the most favoured proxies for a firm’s response to performance feedback and this relation complements the commonly studied influence of innovation (R&amp;D) on a firm’s performance with a backward loop. The performance feedback literature works with a number of models used to empirically test these propositions and this study aims to compare the most common measures and models to locate potentially preferred alternatives for further research. Methodology/Approach: The research uses panel data with 1,558 observations. The sample consists of 208 US stock exchange listed firms followed over the years 2001-2015. Findings: The research suggests that models with separate historical and social aspirations may yield a slightly better fit with the data. However, the findings also indicate differences among R&amp;D related dependent measures and their implications for empirical research. These differences arguably also reflect the underlying construct heterogeneity, therefore, researchers should work carefully with them to correctly explain their findings and provide results comparable to the previous literature. Research Limitation/implication: The limitations of the research rose mainly from the limited number of performance factors studied, which stems from an emphasis on standard financial performance indicators. Originality/Value of paper: The research contributes to the performance feedback literature by complementing a previous study that compared different aspiration models (Bromiley and Harris, 2014). By focusing on financial performance and R&amp;D variables, the research offers the first concise entry point for researchers considering empirical studies on financial performance feedback and R&amp;D relationship.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50204 - Business and management

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Quality Innovation Prosperity

  • ISSN

    1335-1745

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    22

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    1-13

  • UT code for WoS article

    000429616400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85045046773