All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F20%3A00115055" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/20:00115055 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051" target="_blank" >10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study

  • Original language description

    This paper presents new evidence about the governance of risk in public service innovation. It finds that risk is currently poorly understood with public service organizations. Either it is presented as a professional issue or it is dealt with purely as an actuarial or health and safety issue. There is little understanding of risk as a core component of innovation. In response, this paper argues for a more nuanced risk governance approach that calls for transparent decision-making on risk in public service innovation in relation to its intended outcomes. Politicians and public service managers need to understand that risk is an inherent element of innovation, because it engages with uncertain outcomes. A framework needs to be evolved to balance these risks against potential benefits and which can drive forward transparent risk governance involving politicians, public service mangers, citizens and local communities and other key stakeholders. This approach also needs to accept that failure can often by an outcome of innovation. The key here is not to maintain the blame culture that has dominate the debate to date but rather to embrace failure as an opportunity to learn and to improve public services and their outcomes.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50602 - Public administration

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    O - Projekt operacniho programu

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Public Money and Management

  • ISSN

    0954-0962

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    40

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    52-62

  • UT code for WoS article

    000475020100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85067053417