Differences in methodological approaches to evaluate innovation performance in European countries
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F25%3A00141566" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/25:00141566 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/33/1/2146" target="_blank" >https://editorial.upce.cz/1804-8048/33/1/2146</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46585/sp33012146" target="_blank" >10.46585/sp33012146</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Differences in methodological approaches to evaluate innovation performance in European countries
Original language description
In the context of transition to green, digital and knowledge economy, measuring innovation performance is of great importance to understand and improve national and regional competitiveness. Institutional structures in innovation systems that ensure the coordination and interaction of innovation activities within the country, undertake the tasks of regulating innovation activity and executing and carrying out competitive development programs based on reported assessments and performance metrics. This paper brings a comparison of selected innovation performance indices. The primary aim is to evaluate how these indices measure, assess and categorize innovation performance in the European contexts. Four important frameworks are considered in the study: the Global Innovation Index (WIPO), the European Innovation Scoreboard (European Commission), Global Competitiveness Index (World Economic Forum) and the Bloomberg Innovation Index framework. The study assesses innovation success by analysing different assessment methods, indicators and weighting systems. The analysis shows that innovation assessment is multidimensional, while European indices reflect regional characteristics and assessments are concentrated across different actors, scales and sectors. By providing a comparative analysis of innovation assessment frameworks, this study improves the understanding of methodological differences and indicator weights and provides important conclusions on how these changes affect the assessment of innovation performance in European countries. This contributes to the ongoing debate on improving innovation measurement approaches to better respond to the dynamic challenges of contemporary innovation ecosystems.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50200 - Economics and Business
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration
ISSN
1211-555X
e-ISSN
1804-8048
Volume of the periodical
33
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
1-17
UT code for WoS article
001531358500001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105011302426