All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Blinatumomab vs historic standard-of-care treatment for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14740%2F20%3A00116120" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14740/20:00116120 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/65269705:_____/20:00072711

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ejh.13375" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ejh.13375</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13375" target="_blank" >10.1111/ejh.13375</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Blinatumomab vs historic standard-of-care treatment for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

  • Original language description

    Objectives Survival outcomes from a single-arm phase 2 blinatumomab study in patients with minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive B-cell precursor (BCP)-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) were compared with those receiving standard of care (SOC) in a historic data set. Methods The primary analysis comprised adult Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative patients in first complete haematologic remission (MRD &gt;= 10(-3)). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between blinatumomab- and SOC-treatment groups. Baseline differences between groups were adjusted by propensity scores. Results The primary analysis included 73 and 182 patients from the blinatumomab and historic data sets, respectively. When weighted by age to the blinatumomab-treatment group, median RFS was 7.8 months and median OS was 25.9 months in the SOC-treated group. In the blinatumomab study, median RFS was 35.2 months; median OS was not evaluable. Propensity score weighting achieved balance with seven baseline prognostic factors. With adjustment for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) status, a 50% reduction in risk of relapse or death was observed with blinatumomab vs SOC. Median RFS, unadjusted for HSCT status, was 35.2 months with blinatumomab and 8.3 months with SOC. Conclusions These analyses suggest that blinatumomab improves RFS, and possibly OS, in adults with MRD-positive Ph-negative BCP-ALL vs SOC.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30205 - Hematology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Journal of Haematology

  • ISSN

    0902-4441

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    104

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    299-309

  • UT code for WoS article

    000509095600001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85078675215