All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Carver, Cavell, and the Uncanniness of the Ordinary

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F18%3A39913620" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/18:39913620 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2018.0000" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2018.0000</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2018.0000" target="_blank" >10.1353/nlh.2018.0000</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Carver, Cavell, and the Uncanniness of the Ordinary

  • Original language description

    A predominant misunderstanding of the philosophical importance of paying attention to our ordinary language is that it supplies us with a standard of correctness. In contrast to this view, it is arguedhere that everyday and ordinary language are so difficult to bring into view and that this is something both J. L. Austin and Ludwig Wittgenstein maintained as well. It is precisely the failure to notice these kinds of difficulties that often leads philosophers into philosophical problems and metaphysical speculation. The philosopher who most clearly has stressed that &quot;the everyday&quot; is something difficult to get into view is Stanley Cavell, and he has also linked the concept of the ordinary to the Freudian concept of the uncanny. The idea of the &quot;Unheimlich&quot; contains the suggestion that there is something uncanny about that which is open to view because it is open to view. Thus, if the real problem with &quot;ordinary language&quot; is that we philosophers take ourselves to be in full command of our everyday language already and need not think more about it, then a presentation of our own familiar language that presents the familiar as something unfamiliar, the homely as strange, might be exactly what philosophy needs. This is one thing Raymond Carver&apos;s short stories achieve. The instability and flexibility here discerned does not warrant philosophico-theoretical &quot;correction,&quot; but is rather a place where the complex, nuanced, and morally charged nature of our ordinary language comes into view. We are vulnerable to each other&apos;s wordings, but that vulnerability may itself be the very bond that holds us together.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centre for Ethics</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    New literary history

  • ISSN

    0028-6087

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    49

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    22

  • Pages from-to

    1-22

  • UT code for WoS article

    000430146700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85046074580