All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Socrates and Theognis on True Love

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F19%3A39915134" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/19:39915134 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://brill.com/view/journals/jpt/13/1/article-p24_2.xml" target="_blank" >https://brill.com/view/journals/jpt/13/1/article-p24_2.xml</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18725473-12341424" target="_blank" >10.1163/18725473-12341424</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Socrates and Theognis on True Love

  • Original language description

    The study compares Theognis&apos; and Socrates&apos; concept of love: there is an ambivalence of love present in both authors in the form of a connection between the pleasing and the unpleasing, that is, on the one hand, devotion to the educatory harshness of the lover, on the other to his skill and cunning. To what extent is the ambivalence in Socrates and Theognis similar or dissimilar? The answer discloses a comparison of ideas about the functioning, the aims, and the meaning of love in the wider context of understanding the life and world of the two authors: such a context exposes the duplicity in Theognis, and the love of negation of unambiguous teaching about the proper life without painful testing. In Socrates, it is exposed to irony, to eternal ignorance and to openness to another and to god&apos;s world. Next, we contrast Theognis&apos; limiting of another&apos;s duplicity (devotion and cunning) to a level between a loving and friendly relationship with Socrates&apos; expansion of the loving struggle into every sphere of life, above all into the relationship of the lover to himself and those close to him. We explain this contrast as a decision between trust in reason and trust in love as the fundamental forces conferring meaning on human life. We show, however, that with Socrates it is not blind love but rather love embracing reason and overlapping divine challenges, while with Theognis it is not pure reason that is involved, but rather reason directed by the socio-political situation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centre for Ethics</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    International Journal of the Platonic Tradition

  • ISSN

    1872-5082

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    27

  • Pages from-to

    24-50

  • UT code for WoS article

    000469389900002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85061501862