All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Interacting with the Expert Witness: Courtroom Epistemics Under a Discourse Analyst’s Lens

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F22%3A39919842" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/22:39919842 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_5" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_5</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_5" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Interacting with the Expert Witness: Courtroom Epistemics Under a Discourse Analyst’s Lens

  • Original language description

    This chapter looks at the interactional behaviour of expert witnesses and counsel acting within the constraints of the adversarial trial. Adopting a discourse-analytic perspective, it demonstrates what stances the witnesses and the counsel adopt and what interactional resources they employ to position themselves vis-à-vis their interactants and their knowledge claims. Drawing on such linguistic concepts as speaker commitment, epistemicity and evidentiality, it examines some of the ways in which expert knowledge is claimed, disclaimed, attributed and contested. It specifically considers the interplay of the pronouns I, you and we with verbal markers of experiential, cognitive and communicative stance (Marín-Arrese, 2009), and with negation. The analysis reveals a correlation between the participants’ roles and communicative goals and the type of stance they adopt during testimony. It thus demonstrates the discursive processes of turning facts and expert opinions into evidence, and explains how the “truth” is constructed in courtroom proceedings.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Language as Evidence: Doing Forensic Linguistics

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-84329-8

  • Number of pages of the result

    26

  • Pages from-to

    105-130

  • Number of pages of the book

    464

  • Publisher name

    Palgrave Macmillan

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • UT code for WoS chapter