All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Importance of proper baseline identification for the subsequent kinetic analysis of derivative kinetic data Part 1

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25310%2F16%3A39901214" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25310/16:39901214 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5297-x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5297-x</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5297-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10973-016-5297-x</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Importance of proper baseline identification for the subsequent kinetic analysis of derivative kinetic data Part 1

  • Original language description

    Using theoretically simulated kinetic datasets, the performance of various types of commonly accessible baselines was tested when the heat capacity of reactants and products is not the same. The quality of the approximation of the true thermokinetic background was compared to the (correct) tangential area-proportional interpolation. Undoubtedly, the most accurate results were provided by the Bezier interpolation, followed by the cubic spline function. In the case of the cubic spline, however, great care needs to be paid to its setting to perform acceptably. The worst results were provided by the simple linear interpolation. Regarding the accuracy of the consequent kinetic analysis, even in the case of large heat capacity changes underlying the kinetic peak, the evaluation of apparent activation energy and pre-exponential factor (model-free analysis) showed only negligible errors for all three tested types of baselines. However, larger heat capacity changes resulted in considerable errors (even similar to 30 %) in the integral area under the peak. Model-based kinetic analysis provided varied results for different methodologies; while the multivariate curve-fitting exhibited acceptable (small) deviations, the peak-shaped analysis provided considerably worse results, particularly the application of the simple linear interpolation led to large errors.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    CF - Physical chemistry and theoretical chemistry

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

  • ISSN

    1388-6150

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    124

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    1717-1725

  • UT code for WoS article

    000376087800056

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database