All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparative Evaluation of the Intellectual Capital dissemination Efficiency of Belgium And Sweden

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F21%3A39917377" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/21:39917377 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.019" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.019</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.019" target="_blank" >10.34190/EKM.21.019</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparative Evaluation of the Intellectual Capital dissemination Efficiency of Belgium And Sweden

  • Original language description

    Creating intellectual capital and a sustained competitive advantage is a key objective of most member states in the European Union. Multiple efforts have been put in place to harness the power of the internal inputs employed to achieve this, however, Belgium has consistently been lagging at the lower spectrum of intellectual capital generation among the European Union member states whilst Sweden currently stands as the one with the best innovative performance. Hence, using Panel data from the European Innovation Scoreboard (2011-2019) for Belgium and Sweden, this paper employed a two-stage DEA analysis (Hybrid Distance) to assess the efficiency of the use of financial injections in transforming into a sustained creation and dissemination of intellectual capital. Findings show that even though there has been steady improvement in efficiency in Belgium for past couple of years, the years of 2016-2018 were found to be relatively more efficient when compared to the preceding years. However, when the results were benchmarked against Sweden, the most innovative member state as of 2018, Belgium was still surprisingly found to be relatively efficient in the years of 2016-2018 prompting insightful learnings from between both countries. Recommendations were provided based on results of input redundancy and output deficiency computations as well as suitable policy implications to avert this gap.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Knowledge Management

  • ISBN

    978-1-914587-06-1

  • ISSN

    2048-8963

  • e-ISSN

    2048-8971

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    276-282

  • Publisher name

    Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited

  • Place of publication

    Sonning Common

  • Event location

    ONLINE

  • Event date

    Sep 2, 2021

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000758201900033