All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

What Determines Firm's Innovation? The Case of Catching-up CEE Countries

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25410%2F21%3A39917955" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25410/21:39917955 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/view/1513" target="_blank" >https://qip-journal.eu/index.php/QIP/article/view/1513</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1513" target="_blank" >10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1513</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    What Determines Firm's Innovation? The Case of Catching-up CEE Countries

  • Original language description

    Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to recognize significant innovation determinants on firms&apos; product, process, and overall innovation activity. Methodology/Approach: The source of data for the analysis is the Community Innovation Survey 2012-2014. If the company has implemented the relevant innovation activity, they acquire a value of 1, or, if the company has not performed a certain activity in the period, they reached 0. As the variables are binary, the logistic regression analysis was used. Findings: Based on the results from the analysis, we defined the proper determinants of firms&apos; innovation activities but unfortunately, firms are not able to achieve innovative outputs, specifically within CEE countries. This is due, among other things, to several factors such as different conditions in individual countries, different innovation policies at the national as well as company level, managerial approach (aversion) to risk, mistrust between the various actors, and many others. A typical example is the impact of internal R&amp;D on firm innovations. While in the case of product innovations we found a significant positive impact, in the case of process innovations the impact was negative Research Limitation/Implication: We performed on outdated data and we did not make a comparison with countries from Western Europe. Originality/Value of paper: The paper analyses innovation determinants and it is importance for innovation activities within the CEE countries. Category: Research paper

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50204 - Business and management

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Quality Innovation Prosperity = Kvalita, inovacia, prosperita

  • ISSN

    1335-1745

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    25

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    22

  • Pages from-to

    33-54

  • UT code for WoS article

    000636478800004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85104515887