Risk of malnutrition assessment in hospitalised adults: A scoping review of existing instruments
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25520%2F22%3A39918819" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25520/22:39918819 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216275:25520/23:39918819
Result on the web
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16470" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16470</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16470" target="_blank" >10.1111/jocn.16470</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Risk of malnutrition assessment in hospitalised adults: A scoping review of existing instruments
Original language description
Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to find tools for screening the risk of malnutrition in adult hospitalised patients, evaluate their key characteristics including selected psychometric properties and propose the most appropriate tools for nursing practice. Background A large number of existing tools for nutritional screening make it difficult to be aware of all the possibilities and especially to select the optimal tool. Design The research methodology was designed as secondary research using a scoping review search to map and compare existing tools for assessing the risk of malnutrition in hospitalised adults. Methods The analysis focused on the selected psychometric properties of the instruments (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) and key characteristics relevant to the selection of an appropriate instrument. This study follows the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Results The review included 27 publications containing 17 tools. The best sensitivity (57%-100%) and specificity (76%-96%) were achieved by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002). Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form-Version II (MEONF-II) has solid sensitivity (up to 73%), specificity (88%) and high positive predictive values (81%-82%). Conclusions The MUST, NRS 2002 and MEONF-II showed satisfactory psychometric properties. MEONF-II and MUST are able to assess risk without weighing the patient. The Hand Grip Strength (HGS) assessment can be recommended to detect reductions in muscle strength. Relevance to clinical practice We recommend the MUST, NRS 2002 and MEONF-II tools for use in clinical practice, as they have the best psychometric properties and are user-friendly. The HGS, which proved to be related to the length of hospital stay (LOS) and used as an indicator of protein-energy malnutrition in obese patients, may be a useful complementary tool. For nursing practice, we recommend selecting a tool with respect to the specifics of a particular workplace.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30307 - Nursing
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Clinical Nursing
ISSN
0962-1067
e-ISSN
1365-2702
Volume of the periodical
Neuveden
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Neuvedeno
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
nestrankovano
UT code for WoS article
000829186900001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85134582055