All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Methods for Evaluation of WWTPs Environmental Impacts: A Review

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F19%3APU131058" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/19:PU131058 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/222/1/012004/pdf" target="_blank" >https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/222/1/012004/pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/222/1/012004" target="_blank" >10.1088/1755-1315/222/1/012004</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Methods for Evaluation of WWTPs Environmental Impacts: A Review

  • Original language description

    Wastewater treatment processes are designed to achieve improvements in the quality of wastewater, however, it also brings both positive and negative environmental impacts (on ecosystem quality, on human health and on resource use). This issue raises many questions. Is it possible to assess these impacts? Which method is the most suitable for assessing the impact on the environment? This paper reviews articles dealing with a methodology for accessing environmental impacts of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Analysis of the published papers has indicated that the most frequently used evaluation tools is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) or methods based on LCA, Cost-benefit Analysis (CBA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in combination with other methods. These methods were described with their characteristics and weaknesses in evaluating. Selecting the appropriate assessment tool is the first step in the decision-making process. It is also necessary to take into account some key aspects: focus point, data that is required, obtained result as well as regulation and direction aspects. Based on extensive research and comparison of assessment methods, especially CBA method in the ex-ante evaluation and DEA method as a suitable supplement in the ex-post evaluation have been recommended for WWTP project evaluation by the authors.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20101 - Civil engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LO1408" target="_blank" >LO1408: AdMaS UP – Advanced Building Materials, Structures and Technologies</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    International Scientific Conference "People, Buildings and Environment 2018 (PBE)

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    1755-1307

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    1-12

  • Publisher name

    IOP Conference Series

  • Place of publication

    Velká Británie

  • Event location

    Brno

  • Event date

    Oct 17, 2018

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000560242800004