All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Quantile-oriented global sensitivity analysis of design resistance.

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F19%3APU135550" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/19:PU135550 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.9627" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.9627</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.9627" target="_blank" >10.3846/jcem.2019.9627</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Quantile-oriented global sensitivity analysis of design resistance.

  • Original language description

    The article investigates the application of a new type of global quantile-oriented sensitivity analysis (called QSA in the article) and contrasts it with established Sobol sensitivity analysis (SSA). Comparison of QSA of the resistance design value (0.1 percentile) with SSA is performed on an example of the analysis of the resistance of a steel IPN 200 beam, which is subjected to lateral-torsional buckling. The resistance is approximated using higher order polynomial metamodels created from advanced non-linear FE models. The main, higher order and total effects are calculated using the Latin Hypercube Sampling method. Noticeable differences between the two methods are found, with QSA apparently revealing higher sensitivity of the resistance design value to random input second and higher order interactions (compared to SSA). SSA cannot identify certain reliability aspects of structural design as comprehensively as QSA, particularly in relation to higher order interactions effects of input imperfections. In order to better understand the reasons for the differences between QSA and SSA, two simple examples are presented, where QSA (median) and SSA show a general agreement in the calculation of certain sensitivity indices.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20101 - Civil engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA18-13212S" target="_blank" >GA18-13212S: Response surface and sensitivity analysis methods in stochastic computational mechanics (RESUS)</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of civil engineering and management

  • ISSN

    1392-3730

  • e-ISSN

    1822-3605

  • Volume of the periodical

    2019

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    25(4)

  • Country of publishing house

    LT - LITHUANIA

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    297-305

  • UT code for WoS article

    000465096700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85065906315