Long adhesive joints in facade applications exposed to wind suction
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F20%3APU136473" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/20:PU136473 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0954408920945065" target="_blank" >https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0954408920945065</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954408920945065" target="_blank" >10.1177/0954408920945065</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Long adhesive joints in facade applications exposed to wind suction
Original language description
This paper provides an insight into the investigation of long thick-layer adhesive facade joint resistance to negative pressure loads, i.e. wind suction. The real structural response to wind actions was simulated with reference to ETAG 034. Each specimen represented a reference facade section. The experiment focused on four different adhesive systems with flexible high strength 1-K polyurethanes and 1-K modified silyl polymers. Several variants of the test assemblies were tested: 1) a test assembly with an adhesive joint when a) the manufacturers' application instructions for the system were followed and b) the instructions were violated; 2) a test assembly with a mechanical joint. These variants made it possible to compare the properties of both fastening methods, and moreover, to assess the impact of the mounting tape on the properties of the adhesive joint. The comparison of adhesive joints and a mechanical joint proved the greater structural stiffness and stress resistance of bonded assemblies. Monitoring showed that a local failure of the fastening element between the load-bearing frame and supporting structure caused the failure of the bonded assemblies, whereas the specimen with mechanically attached cladding failed due to pull-through of the fasteners. The average failure load of the bonded assembly was 10.88 kPa. In contrast, the failure load of the segment with mechanical fasteners was 10.12 kPa. Even though the difference in maximum pressure loads was only around 7%, the recorded values clearly demonstrate that the weakest part of the whole facade system is the mechanical joint, not the bonded one. Furthermore, the comparison of the results for segments with and without mounting tape showed that tape can have a major impact on the bond strength, since in case of the test specimens without mounting tape, the recorded failure load was a maximum of 30% higher.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/FV20606" target="_blank" >FV20606: Bonding technique of Large Format Tiles</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART E-JOURNAL OF PROCESS MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
ISSN
0954-4089
e-ISSN
2041-3009
Volume of the periodical
234
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
488-498
UT code for WoS article
000552029800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85088385750