Intercomparison of multi-GNSS signals characteristics acquired by a low-cost receiver connected to various low-cost antennas
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26110%2F24%3APU151086" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26110/24:PU151086 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00025615:_____/24:N0000002
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10291-024-01628-4</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Intercomparison of multi-GNSS signals characteristics acquired by a low-cost receiver connected to various low-cost antennas
Original language description
With the increasing number of low-cost GNSS antennas available on the market, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis and intercomparison of their performance. Moreover, multi-GNSS observation noises are not well recognized for low-cost receivers. This study characterizes the quality of GNSS signals acquired by low-cost GNSS receivers equipped with eight types of antennas in terms of signal acquisition, multipath error and receiver noise. The differences between various types of low-cost antennas are non-negligible, with helical antennas underperforming in every respect. Compared with a geodetic-grade station, GPS and Galileo signals acquired by low-cost receivers are typically weaker by 3–9 dB-Hz. While the L1, E1 and E5b signals are well-tracked, only 72% and 86% of L2 signals are acquired for GPS and GLONASS, respectively. The signal noise for pseudoranges varies from 0.12 m for Galileo E5b to over 0.30 m for GLONASS L1 and L2, whereas for carrier-phase observations it oscillates around 1 mm for both GPS and Galileo frequencies, but exceeds 3 mm for both GLONASS frequencies. Antenna phase center offsets (PCOs) vary significantly between frequencies and constellations, and do not agree between two antennas of the same type by up to 25 mm in the vertical component. After a field calibration a of low-cost antenna and consistent application of PCOs, the horizontal and vertical accuracy is improved to a few millimeter and a few centimeter level for the multi-GNSS processing with double-differenced and undifferenced approach, respectively. Last but not least, we demonstrate that PPP-AR is possible also with low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas, and improves the precision and convergence time. The results prove that selection of low-cost antenna for a low-cost GNSS receiver is of great importance in precise positioning applications.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10509 - Meteorology and atmospheric sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
GPS SOLUTIONS
ISSN
1080-5370
e-ISSN
1521-1886
Volume of the periodical
28
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
1-13
UT code for WoS article
001177572100001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85187132472