A comparison of two direct methods of generalized stress intesity factor calculations of bi-material notches
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F08%3APU76199" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/08:PU76199 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A comparison of two direct methods of generalized stress intesity factor calculations of bi-material notches
Original language description
Two types of direct methods of calculating of generalized stress intesity factors (GSIF) are presented, tested and compared. Recommendations for reliable estimation of GSIF are suggested.
Czech name
A comparison of two direct methods of generalized stress intesity factor calculations of bi-material notches
Czech description
Two types of direct methods of calculating of generalized stress intesity factors (GSIF) are presented, tested and compared. Recommendations for reliable estimation of GSIF are suggested.
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
JL - Fatigue and fracture mechanics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2008
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Key Engineering Materials
ISSN
1013-9826
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
385
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—